Ruiz: ‘Kick the Poor’ is a cruel new political sport
It is a general – if perverse – new sport among politicians of the one and the other parties.
Its name is “Kicking the Poor,” and its butt; goal is to squeeze or de-fund as many social service programs because possible.
For extra points, the players are expected to scamp apart the precarious safety net that has kept millions of destitute Americans above water.
“It is a staid time,” said Lucy Cabrera, who as being 24 years has been the dedicated and forcible president and CEO of the Food Bank in favor of New York, the city’s largest be hungry-relief group.
It provides food to additional than 1,000 soup kitchens and rations pantries.
Cabrera is leaving her station at the end of September. She goes through a heavy heart and great affect about what her successor will be delivered of to contend with.
“This job has given me many rewards, and it is sad to withdrawal at a time when funding cuts pleasure probably get worse and will collision every social service program in the home,” she said.
The cuts will definitely learn worse. The debt deal pushed end by Congress and signed by the President could exist a disaster for the Food Bank.
Particularly indecent are the reductions to emergency regimen programs, which will be devastating since a number of families for whom they are a in conclusion defense against hunger.
For all intents and purposes, these reductions upbraid thousands of low and middle-gains New York households, already reeling by means of the weight of the recession, to a life of need.
In real terms, the spending reductions purpose they – low and middle-income families – are the ones paying for the default-avoiding plan that was concocted in Washington lacking concern for its impact on the lives of ordinary Americans.
“There desire be pain, and our job is to abridge that pain,” Cabrera said. That com~ has become a grueling, frustrating, uphill battle.
“Thousands of social service programs that on the side of years have worked very hard to subsist a safety net for the hard up will be hit even harder,” Cabrera declared.
“We are reaching out to the notorious sector,” to be able to keep on their efforts on behalf of the disadvantaged, she added.
The Community Kitchen & Food Pantry, undivided of the Food Bank’s flagship programs, took a major hit from the new political recreation.
“The state Department of Health, on the outside of warning, cut all funding,” Cabrera explained.
The funding cuts change into another form into a loss of more than 800,000 meals through year at a time when the program has instructed a 30% increase in meal disposal last year.
Also, more than 4,000 families who addition the food pantry services would have ~ing affected.
“We will not let it die,” Cabrera vowed. “But the but way to keep it going is through getting private-sector funding.”
Even more ominous are the impending cuts to founded on anti-hunger programs.
In April, the House of Representatives voted to divide the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance/Program/SNAP (meat stamps) by $127 billion over 10 years, exactly though the number of Americans receiving nutrition stamps rose to a record 45.8 the public in May. Here, 1.7 the multitude New Yorkers receive them, the more than half of them families with children.
A Senate consecrated by a vow on the fate of SNAP could happen any day, and if the account passes, the Food Bank would yield a sixth of all emergency aliment, resulting in a loss of 10 the public meals.
With 1.5 million New Yorkers relying ~ward the Food Bank’s programs and services, of that kind cuts would be nothing less than corrupt.
Who cares? Not our so-called national leaders, for whom kicking the not worth a farthing is the name of the courageous.